Quote:
Originally Posted by Mugenextreme
The rule change was not updated incorrectly, it was update as per the proposal submitted prior to the agm. You would need to be a right muppet to make a mistake in changing a 0 to a 4.
|
Fair enough.
Just to be clear my point was not about if it was a rule change, it was obvious it was a rule change, but I do remember questions being asked and at the end of the discussion I remember it being said the new rules would be aspirational guidelines rather then written in stone specs. As I said this is from memory and I could be mistaken
From my point of view the horse has already bolted, lets get on with enjoying the summer season and we can sort this stuff out at the next RCCAOI AGM
(that's if guys are willing to put the effort in?)