Go Back   oOple.com Forums > General > 1/10th OFF ROAD

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 19-02-2014
B0tt0mline B0tt0mline is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Vienna, Austria
Posts: 84
Default Yokomo B-Max III or Losi 22-4

Hi,

I am think about getting a 4WD buggy, which should only be used as "second" car. I do not want to put lots of effort in maintenance

Currently I am not sure if the Yokomo B-Max III or the Losi 22-4 is the better choice.
Which car requires less maintenance?
Which diffs are easier to access?

For which car do I find more "beginner" setups?

Thanks!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 19-02-2014
HyperDunley HyperDunley is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
Posts: 166
Default

Hi. Interesting topic this, as I am too currently looking at both these buggies as an alternative to my current Durango 410 v3.

I do believe that neither of these buggies, including the Durango, are for 'beginners' though, as they seem to have multiple tuning options, which are only good if you know what you are doing!

However out of the 2 you mentioned, I would say the Yokomo would be the better entry level car, and an easier one to work on too....
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 19-02-2014
AfroP AfroP is offline
Mad Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Newcastle upon tyne
Posts: 1,112
Default

based entirely on the fact that the bmax 4 III is geared diff and shaft drive i'd say its easier to maintain.
but as with everything else i'd say check what others at your local track are running no point in getting an easy to maintain car if nobody else has one and can advise on setups etc
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 20-02-2014
rcpower's Avatar
rcpower rcpower is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 425
Default

Already considered the sworkz? Cheaper, easy to build and to drive, stronger, unique in it's design...
__________________
==> check out our youtube channel http://www.youtube.com/rcstefracing
==> FB https://www.facebook.com/RCstefracing/
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 20-02-2014
AfroP AfroP is offline
Mad Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Newcastle upon tyne
Posts: 1,112
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rcpower View Post
Already considered the sworkz? Cheaper, easy to build and to drive, stronger, unique in it's design...
"unique in its design" is a polite way of saying its uglier than a pitbull chewing on a wasp ;-)
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 20-02-2014
discothesnake's Avatar
discothesnake discothesnake is offline
Mad Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 1,476
Default

"unique in its design" is a polite way of saying its uglier than a pitbull chewing on a wasp ;-)

You really are not wrong!
__________________
Team Associated
Hobbywing
SRT
Reedy

My feedback
http://www.oople.com/forums/showthread.php?t=63097
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 20-02-2014
Danosborne6661's Avatar
Danosborne6661 Danosborne6661 is offline
Mad Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,301
Default

We had 3x of the 22-4's at Mendip Raceway last Sunday. Even though the drivers were not our usual top lot they're cars looked amazing, this was on bumpy astroturf. One of the best 4WD's I've seen go round our place for sure.
__________________
SchumacherPhat Bodies

Mendip R/C Raceway - Offroad Racing in South-West
WORM-Racing - GT12 Racing in the South-West
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 20-02-2014
rcpower's Avatar
rcpower rcpower is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 425
Default

It's not the nicest shell, okay you got me there!, BUT
that's a personal matter of fact guys.

It's not a grey mouse(if we are gonna make comparisons with animals) like all the rest out there.

What do you say about the arguments "stronger" and "cheaper"? ... nothing I guess From the very first batch it was good. It could be raced without having fear to brake hingepins, towers, diffgears and other stuff.

Quote:
Originally Posted by discothesnake View Post
"unique in its design" is a polite way of saying its uglier than a pitbull chewing on a wasp ;-)

You really are not wrong!
__________________
==> check out our youtube channel http://www.youtube.com/rcstefracing
==> FB https://www.facebook.com/RCstefracing/
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 20-02-2014
Chris-S Chris-S is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Leamington Spa
Posts: 432
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rcpower View Post
It's not the nicest shell, okay you got me there!, BUT
that's a personal matter of fact guys.
Can I borrow your rose tinted glasses, as I am really struggling to see how anyone would consider the shell to be moderately pleasing to the eye. Its horrendous, end of.

Quote:
It's not a grey mouse(if we are gonna make comparisons with animals) like the Xray, Team C, Yokomo or all other copies out there. You cannot go round the fact that it's more an original concept than the rest.
Being different is not always the best. If you look at the cars in detail, they are all different.

Quote:
What do you say about the arguments "stronger" and "cheaper"? ... nothing I guess From the very first batch it could be build from the box and races without having fear to brake hingepins, towers, gears and other stuff.
Not broken or had any issues with my XB4, set the slipper correctly (those that have issues generally have the slipper way too tight and are landing on full power) and dont forget, 4wd tends to need a bit more care with maintenance than 2wd in my experience.

Does the sworkz come with upgraded shock o-rings, as the one I was asked to work on (it looked terrible going round the track) felt like the o-rings were contributing to a considerable amount of damping.
__________________
Kyosho RB6
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 20-02-2014
rcpower's Avatar
rcpower rcpower is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 425
Default

If you build the shocks with one o-ring in stead of two (and just use an additional spacer)the problem is solved, and still leak free.

I agree on you though that a 4WD needs a bit more maintenance and the setup of the slipper plays a key role in the driveline longevity.

That said, for the money the Sworkz ain't a bad car IMO.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris-S View Post
Does the sworkz come with upgraded shock o-rings, as the one I was asked to work on (it looked terrible going round the track) felt like the o-rings were contributing to a considerable amount of damping.
__________________
==> check out our youtube channel http://www.youtube.com/rcstefracing
==> FB https://www.facebook.com/RCstefracing/
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 20-02-2014
dpackster1980 dpackster1980 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Jarrow
Posts: 987
Default

I like the look of the Losi, I had a XX4 when they but first came out and loved it so much I bought a re release worlds kit when they were out.

I run the Yokomo 2wd so I went for the B-Max4. So easy to maintain and so easy to drive fast. The drivetrain is bomb proof too and getting diff access is only 4 screws. It's these little things that make it a pleasure to work on. Also with UK top drivers running them setups aren't in short supply unlike when they were first releases.

Despite the Losi's bigger pitched belts only time will tell if they solved one of the major issues of the old car. It doesn't look the easiest car to work on though. I keep having flashbacks every time I see one of trying change a belt. If it handles like the old car you won't care.
__________________
Schumacher KF2
Schumacher K2

2011 Muchmore GP 4wd Champion

www.rccarshop.co.uk
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 20-02-2014
tyreman's Avatar
tyreman tyreman is offline
Mad Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Leamington Spa
Posts: 1,919
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dpackster1980 View Post
I like the look of the Losi, I had a XX4 when they but first came out and loved it so much I bought a re release worlds kit when they were out.

I run the Yokomo 2wd so I went for the B-Max4. So easy to maintain and so easy to drive fast. The drivetrain is bomb proof too and getting diff access is only 4 screws. It's these little things that make it a pleasure to work on. Also with UK top drivers running them setups aren't in short supply unlike when they were first releases.

Despite the Losi's bigger pitched belts only time will tell if they solved one of the major issues of the old car. It doesn't look the easiest car to work on though. I keep having flashbacks every time I see one of trying change a belt. If it handles like the old car you won't care.
The pitch of the belts in the losi hasn't changed, what has changed is the material, they are bando belts which is the same brand the Schumacher range of cars use.
__________________
TLR, Screwz4RC, Spektrum, Horizon Hobby,
Trinity, Trishbits, Racer, RichPaint, RDT products,
Sanwa, Zen Racing, Silverback Lipo's

http://www.screwz4rc.co.uk

Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 21-02-2014
sime46's Avatar
sime46 sime46 is offline
Mad Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chesterfield.
Posts: 1,319
Default

The Losi is ace. I've been very pleasantly surprised by how well it goes. I confess that I have broken a front tower but it was a proper crash and would've broken any car.
__________________

PBM Racing 01773 769323
TEAM XRAY
RC DISCO
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
oOple.com