Go Back   oOple.com Forums > General > General Race Chat

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-01-2012
Skye's Avatar
Skye Skye is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Northants
Posts: 626
Default Air travel with LiPo batteries - a response from the CAA.

As promised I contacted the Civil Aviation Authority last week, in response to the discussion on here over carrying LiPo batteries in your luggage during air travel.

I have now had a response from them so here are the main points extracted from the reply :
  • Provided the lithium ion batteries have a watt-hour rating of no more than 100 Wh, then in addition to those inside the car, there is no restriction on the number of spare batteries that can be carried, provided that each one is individually protected from short circuit and they are for that person’s own use.
  • They should also be carried in carry-on baggage rather than in checked (hold) baggage.
  • There is no requirement for the batteries to be contained in a LiPo sack, although the added protection the sack provides is welcome.
I also requested a formal written document specifically written for this subject which I have been promised in the near future, as soon as I receive this then I will put it on here or on a link where it can be easily accessed and printed off by anyone who may require it.

There may be further complications in the near future however as they also added :

There will be an additional requirement that will be introduced from 1 January 2013 (or possibly sooner depending upon the results of an international meeting in February), which will be that each cell and battery carried by a passenger must be of a type that has successfully passed a series of United Nations tests.

I provided them with a PDF file of all the BRCA approved batteries for 2011 which their response in relation to the above statement was :

I note that the attachment you included contains a list of BRCA approved batteries and I wouldn’t guarantee that they have all been subjected to this testing.

So it appears that batteries that we currently use may not be legal for air travel within the next 12 months if they have either a; not passed the new regualtions, or b; not have the relevant certification to confirm they have passed the tests.

Once I have the formal document, or if I receive any additional information on the subject then I will post it up on here to share with everyone.

Last edited by gainsy; 09-01-2012 at 04:17 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-01-2012
h0m3sy's Avatar
h0m3sy h0m3sy is offline
Mad Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Larne. N.Ireland
Posts: 1,180
Default

Great work Skye
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-01-2012
gainsy's Avatar
gainsy gainsy is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: St Albans
Posts: 1,561
Default

Great info Rich
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-01-2012
russmini's Avatar
russmini russmini is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Worcs
Posts: 520
Send a message via MSN to russmini
Default

The only thing i would mention is the CAA have put Lion whereas, we run LiPo...

I know in essence they are the same, but there is a slight difference, especially in what they are called, so therfore cause still cause a problem if you got a Mr Jobsworth...
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-01-2012
Skye's Avatar
Skye Skye is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Northants
Posts: 626
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by russmini View Post
The only thing i would mention is the CAA have put Lion whereas, we run LiPo...

I know in essence they are the same, but there is a slight difference, especially in what they are called, so therfore cause still cause a problem if you got a Mr Jobsworth...
A good point, we know there is minimal difference but airport staff may not. I will feed this back so the final document reflects this.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-01-2012
DCM's Avatar
DCM DCM is offline
Spends too long on oOple ...
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Marvelous South Wales!!
Posts: 8,896
Default

I was under the impression that for the battery to be exported and couriered via air travel, they had to meet this UN thing anyhows, I guess getting the COSHH leaflet from the distributor or clarification from them, as in a certificate or signed document would be sufficient?
__________________
dragon paints : team tekin : fusion hobbies :SCHUMACHER RACING : Nuclear R/C for all my sticky and slippery stuff - if it needs gluing or lubing, Nuclear RC is the man!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-01-2012
James's Avatar
James James is offline
RHR RACING
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Worksop/Blyth Tracks Nottinghamshire
Posts: 2,457
Send a message via MSN to James
Default

Great post, very informative and useful
__________________
~JAMES HELLIWELL~ROBIN HOOD RACEWAY~RHR DIRT~WORKSOP RACEWAY~BIRDS EYE VIEW~
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-01-2012
neiloliver neiloliver is offline
Mad Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Shrewsbury
Posts: 1,208
Default

Lithium ion and Lithium polymer cells and batteries already have to meet the tests described in the UN Manual of Tests and Criteria, Fifth Revised Edition (ST/SG/AC.10/11/Rev.5 section 38.3 and be <100Wh if they are to be excepted from Dangerous goods shipping. I don't think I have seen any packs with the Wh rating on them but it IS a requirement and has been for some time.

The UN code (UN3480) is the same for both Lithium Polymer and Lithium Ion - there is no distinction between the two.

N
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-01-2012
SlowOne SlowOne is offline
Mad Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,549
Default

Can I assume that to calculate the Wh it is Ah x volts? For example, 6000mAh = 6Ah x 3.7 V = 22.2 Wh, or 6Ah x 7.4v = 44.4Wh. Just checking...

Thanks for the info Neil and Skye.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-01-2012
neiloliver neiloliver is offline
Mad Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Shrewsbury
Posts: 1,208
Default

Yes, it is the rated capacity (in Ah) multiplied by the average voltage (in V). and is expressed in Wh. These would normally be based on the 5 hour discharge rate.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 09-01-2012
mark christopher's Avatar
mark christopher mark christopher is offline
Spends too long on oOple ...
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: haxey, doncaster
Posts: 7,787
Send a message via MSN to mark christopher
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by neiloliver View Post
I don't think I have seen any packs with the Wh rating on them but it IS a requirement and has been for some time.


N
ALL 2012 homlogated lipo will have the watt hours on them, now a brca/efra reguirment
__________________
MBModels - Schumacher Racing - Vapextech.co.uk - MRT - Savox - SMD
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-01-2012
Steven Forster's Avatar
Steven Forster Steven Forster is offline
Mad Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Peterlee, County Durham
Posts: 1,770
Send a message via Yahoo to Steven Forster
Default

The LiPos we use in RC must already have some kind of relevant certification for them to be transported all around the world by plane as i know my Lipos came from hong kong via air mail.............

On a side note there was a fire on a plane not long ago caused by a lipo/lion battery which was being used in a mobile phone during a call.......!!!
__________________
AKA Dexter

Ex Club Chairman

Visit our Face Book Page for address and to book in

https://www.facebook.com/groups/289589121226171/

http://www.neamotorsport.co.uk/
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-01-2012
Gayo's Avatar
Gayo Gayo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 991
Default

Many thanks for your time and investigations.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skye View Post
Once I have the formal document, or if I receive any additional information on the subject then I will post it up on here to share with everyone.
Really interested in this too.
__________________
Schumacher KF | K1 Aero | RWS RZ6R |MiniZ MR-03 | Orion R10 esc | LRP motors | Orion 90c lipos

Rusti Design - Awesome custom stickers and cool stuff

My trader feedback
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-01-2012
DaSloth's Avatar
DaSloth DaSloth is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 602
Default

So we'll be scrutineered at the airport and the race track now!?

Very informative post though, very well done.
__________________
www.insidelineracing.co.uk
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-01-2012
Skye's Avatar
Skye Skye is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Northants
Posts: 626
Default

In response to Neils comments stating his belief that batteries are already subject to the UN tests and regulations I took this up with the CAA. The response I have just received is :
  • All lithium batteries are currently required to be of a type where both the cells and the batteries have successfully passed the UN tests when sent as cargo.
  • The requirements for passengers are slightly different currently since there is no specific requirement that the cells and batteries must be of a type that has been tested, but as indicated previously, this will be changing by 2013 at the latest.

Other points of consideration given are :
  • For those people shipping them, they shouldn’t assume that they have been tested, since we have come across a number of companies in the UK that have sourced cells or batteries from other companies and have found that they haven’t been tested.
  • Equally, there have been some companies that have bought batches of cells that have been tested and then used those to produce battery packs for specific products, without realising that they then need to subject the completed packs to the same tests.
  • Even more worryingly, there are some parts of the World where it is common practice to produce certificates saying that the tests have been carried out when they haven’t.
  • In practice, most commercially available batteries will have been tested, such as those used in laptops, cell phones, watches etc, so it is the more specialised types of batteries where some care will be needed.
I hope that helps clarify a few things...
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 17-11-2013
JabberingJimbo JabberingJimbo is offline
New Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Crawley, Sussex
Posts: 28
Default

Just dragging up this old thread...any new updates or adivse for flying to US with Lipo's......
Looks like I'm doing a round of the J Concepts 'super cup' in Florida in less than 2 weeks

So far it looks like car, radio + batts packed nicely in carry on bags...what else am I missing.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 17-11-2013
neiloliver neiloliver is offline
Mad Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Shrewsbury
Posts: 1,208
Default

Insulate terminals with tape and put in carry-on luggage only. Do not put in checked luggage

http://safetravel.dot.gov/
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 18-11-2013
MatJohnson MatJohnson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Buckley, N. Wales
Posts: 776
Default

Yep, hand luggage only. They even ask if they are in devices or spares in checked baggage now.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 18-11-2013
JabberingJimbo JabberingJimbo is offline
New Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Crawley, Sussex
Posts: 28
Default

Cool, thank you
Time to start packing....
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 09-03-2016
Mash Potato's Avatar
Mash Potato Mash Potato is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Berkshire
Posts: 365
Default

Any updates on this folks?

I've tried contacting the airline I'm travelling with but seem to be drawing a blank. Info I have found seems to be that the rules have recently changed, but if I can get a definitive answer or pointer to the info that would be ideal.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
oOple.com