Go Back   oOple.com Forums > Car Talk > Team Durango

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 16-08-2013
slippy's Avatar
slippy slippy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: York.uk
Posts: 66
Default DEX210 chassis ????

Hi all. I have a DEX210 RTR and am interested in changing the chassis to alloy as when I had RM config it was fine but since changing to MM adding weight losing bracing and changing things to suit me the chassis now flex,s between the battery and the motor to a level I,m not happy with. Now the part no. for the chassis in the RTR manual according to Durango,s site does not exist.
So.

Which chassis does my rtr have ?

Which alloy chassis would be a direct replacement ?

Do you know of a better choice ?

Would changing to alloy be beneficial ?

Cheers.

Dave.
__________________
CAT L1
B6.1D
Dex 210
FTX Vantage
Cen FF.NT
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 16-08-2013
AfroP AfroP is offline
Mad Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Newcastle upon tyne
Posts: 1,112
Default

the rtr as far as I'm aware comes with the original dimec chassis which Durango did away with as it was weak and broke lots.
It's +8mm longer than the standard alloy chassis that comes in the kit version of the 210

the only direct replacement would be the Dimec 20 Spec B which is also a plastic chassis but with less flex.
The Spec B correct the weakness from the original dimec and dimec 20 but requires additional spec B parts such as the front bulkhead and rear toe blocks.

There is a +11 alloy chassis from RDRP but your looking at a cost of roughly £90 for that
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 16-08-2013
ekt's Avatar
ekt ekt is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Australia
Posts: 129
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by slippy View Post
Hi all. I have a DEX210 RTR and am interested in changing the chassis to alloy as when I had RM config it was fine but since changing to MM adding weight losing bracing and changing things to suit me the chassis now flex,s between the battery and the motor to a level I,m not happy with. Now the part no. for the chassis in the RTR manual according to Durango,s site does not exist.
So.

Which chassis does my rtr have ?

Which alloy chassis would be a direct replacement ?

Do you know of a better choice ?

Would changing to alloy be beneficial ?

Cheers.

Dave.
As AfroP said, the RTR comes with the old DIMEC chassis, it is 8mm longer than TD's aluminium chassis.
Currently there are no +8mm alloy chassis, only +10 from Tresrey and +11 from RDRP. Here's a list of the current chassis offerings http://durangofansite.com/DEX210aftermarket.php#chassis
Changing to an alloy chassis would reduce the flex, which is generally what people are after for high grip situations.
__________________

Team Durango Australia
www.team-durango.com

Proline Australia

A list of option parts and other information for Durango vehicles. www.durangofansite.com
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 16-08-2013
jo90's Avatar
jo90 jo90 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 425
Default

The above is correct, except there is a +8mm chassis out there which I currently use from CRC.

The Tresrey and RDRP products are very well made also, so really it's a question of money, and what you want to pay for.
__________________
If you have trader feedback for me please go to http://www.oople.com/forums/showthread.php?t=120160 - Thanks

Currently utilising (abusing) Durango DEX210 / KO Propo Espritt III / Tekin / LRP / SpeedPassion / Savox
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 16-08-2013
kartstuffer's Avatar
kartstuffer kartstuffer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Dublin
Posts: 473
Default

There is also the 8racing carbon + 8 chassis , but for any of these you will also need the plastic side pods as well.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 16-08-2013
slippy's Avatar
slippy slippy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: York.uk
Posts: 66
Default

Ok lads some great info there. The machined alloy ones are all expensive but when I think back to the upgrades I paid for on my RJX50 nitro heli by comparison its not bad for what you get so after all that info I think its going to be the RDRP or carbon and as I already have some rdrp stuff on my car I,m edging that way.

Thanks everyone.

Dave.
__________________
CAT L1
B6.1D
Dex 210
FTX Vantage
Cen FF.NT
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 16-08-2013
Lee24h's Avatar
Lee24h Lee24h is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Northampton
Posts: 758
Default

You need the side pods if you buy a standard alloy chassis
the standard alloy is the best for now
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 16-08-2013
NeilRalph77's Avatar
NeilRalph77 NeilRalph77 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: LV-426
Posts: 770
Default

What i'd like is a standard length carbon one! The exotec ones nice with the alloy kick up but +8, and what's all this LRC about?
__________________
----Cougar 2 team----Cougar 2 works----Cougar 2000----
----Schumacher Bosscat----
----Traxxas TRX1----Losi XXX CR----Losi XXX BK2----
----AE B4 ft----Xfactory X6^----DEX210 V1----
----TLR22 3.0----TLR22 4.0----TLR22t 4.0----TLR22 5.0AC----
----AE B6.4----
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 16-08-2013
jkclifford's Avatar
jkclifford jkclifford is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Deal
Posts: 495
Default

I have a few +8 aluminium chassis left.
details are on here in,the TD section.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 16-08-2013
av4625 av4625 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Omagh
Posts: 521
Default

i read above that you had to change the front bulkhead for the spec B Dimec 20 chassis? Will my cream brass bulkhead fit and will any of the aftermarket RF antisquat blocks fit?
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 16-08-2013
AfroP AfroP is offline
Mad Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Newcastle upon tyne
Posts: 1,112
Default

Yep a new front bulkhead is needed. Doubt the cream one will fit. I had the tresrey and it didn't fit
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 16-08-2013
ekt's Avatar
ekt ekt is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Australia
Posts: 129
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by av4625 View Post
i read above that you had to change the front bulkhead for the spec B Dimec 20 chassis? Will my cream brass bulkhead fit and will any of the aftermarket RF antisquat blocks fit?
The current line of aftermarket bulkheads wont fit. RF holders will fit though
__________________

Team Durango Australia
www.team-durango.com

Proline Australia

A list of option parts and other information for Durango vehicles. www.durangofansite.com
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 16-08-2013
Cream Cream is offline
oOple Advertiser
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Southport
Posts: 682
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by av4625 View Post
i read above that you had to change the front bulkhead for the spec B Dimec 20 chassis? Will my cream brass bulkhead fit and will any of the aftermarket RF antisquat blocks fit?
No the Cream bulkhead won't fit the new chassis. Looks like a redesign is required.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 18-08-2013
dex210Nick dex210Nick is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 48
Default

I did this for about $20 worth of FRP. It's +8mm, light, and very rigid. It gets the weight exactly where it needs to be. If you've got a drill, dremel, and patience, it's definitely worth a shot. You'll need to cut off the front end of your current chassis to get the kick up, but if you're going to replace it anyway why not try to make something useful out of it?

Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 19-08-2013
Loheswaran Loheswaran is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: London
Posts: 150
Default Buy this one

Quote:
Originally Posted by jkclifford View Post
I have a few +8 aluminium chassis left.
details are on here in,the TD section.
This is a really good chassis. Much better VFM than the other ones out there. Yes RDRP and TRESRAY have some mega fancy machining, but a quick look at Jorn Neumanns chassis will reveal something far closer to the original chassis - bit like this one.

A nice touch is that the lengthening is at the rear - you can fiddle around with flex on it as well.

I recall James, who makes the chassis, telling me that the lengthening of the chassis helps to shift the weight back on the car without making it twitchy. The car, IMHO, just simply sits better at the back, and does not have that annoying mid-corner twitch than the shorter chassis - I say this in the view of a novice/amateur.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
oOple.com