A really good 'traffic' solicitor - Page 3

MRD · #41 05-12-2009

This thread is bound to be fake because Ive heared of extreem speeders being given an instant on the spot ban and this is as extreem as it gets. Plus, 140 in a 30 would require a long stretch of road and a very clear one at that. I can't even do 30 on most of the roads round here.

Nice Troll.

bodgit · #42 05-12-2009

It probably is a fake. 140mph is 2.3 miles per minute that would have to be a hell of a straight road .

daz · #43 05-12-2009

Quote:

Originally Posted by bodgit

It probably is a fake. 140mph is 2.3 miles per minute that would have to be a hell of a straight road .

theres plenty of roads around here where theres a national speed limit which you could easily do 140 on a bike, which suddenly change to a 30 due to build up of houses etc. So its possible, but dont forget Lee put the post up and he likes doing alot of fishing, i cant believe how gullible people are.

bodgit · #44 05-12-2009

Exactly. he,s bored now he has no stampy to duel with.
My bike 0-60 2.3sec 165mph but I,ve never been over 30 mph honest

mark christopher · #45 05-12-2009

Quote:

Originally Posted by i4n

But it isn't speeding though, is it? It's dangerous driving and that's where the sentence and ban come from. Come on, just think about it for a moment - in the case quoted from the BBC he was doing 106MPH over the speed limit.

In Lee's friends case it's even worse - >140MPH in a 30MPH zone, >110MPH over the limit. Think about it for a moment - that's AT LEAST 40MPH over the speed limit FOR A MOTORWAY in this country.

IMO, it's fully justified. If you're reckless and dangerous enough to do things like that then I'm afraid it's a time in chokey for you, simple. I know I posted the link earlier about the Solicitor but I truly believe the guy (or gal!) should get whatever the court decides they deserve.

You may not agree with the limits that are set (especially on the motorway) but they have to abided by, or face the consequences. I do a lot of miles with my job (mainly dual carriageways and motorways) and I stick to the limits, but it amazes me the amount of people that don't.

BTW - this is me speaking as someone who has hit a child in a 30MPH zone when they ran out into the road in front of me from between two parked cars (I was doing just under 30MPH as I was accelerating away from a roundabout). The child survived with relatively minor injuries but I felt like crap for ages after, even though it wasn't my fault. Now imagine the same scenario if I was doing 60MPH, let alone 140MPH. How would you like it if it was your child that was hit?

ah but if you had have been doing 60 or 140, you would have been long gone before he ran out.

there for speed would have resulted in no accident!!!

PaulRotheram · #46 05-12-2009

Not too sure thats an appropriate comment..

qatmix · #47 05-12-2009

will need a good solicitor if he is to avoid jail. As long as his speed is tracked the dangerous driving case is pretty tight as its 4 times over the speed limit.

MALLET · #48 05-12-2009

Quote:

Originally Posted by daz

Another good cast by Lee

Cheers Daz I'll not take this twat serious again

DaveM · #49 05-12-2009

140 in a 30 zone

Smells of bull to me.

bigred5765 · #50 05-12-2009

Quote:

Originally Posted by MALLET

Cheers Daz I'll not take this twat serious again

Lee Twat ? No
Cock = yeh

Hotel porn star = yeh

wind up artist=? may be

MALLET · #51 05-12-2009

Quote:

Originally Posted by bigred5765

Lee Twat ? No
Cock = yeh

Hotel porn star = yeh

wind up artist=? may be

I ran right into that one didn't I

I take it back He's a cock

ben · #52 05-12-2009

As daz said..

Lee through the bait out and you all grabbed it

DCM · #53 05-12-2009

My ex got banned for 3 years, must resit her test to get it back, and a suspended 2 year custodial sentence for doing more than 100mph in a built up area..... unfortunately, she missed totalling the car and herself on the round-a-bout

T4miy4 Guy · #54 06-12-2009

I resently got caught but i was doing 39 in a 30 zone

Took the option a a driving course and fine

Completed the 4 hour course (which was a good refresher as its been 16 years since i passed my test and even tho i went into the course with a negative attitude ,i came out and felt they had taught me something)

regarding this tho 140 is ridiculous in a 30 zone

Andy

Rich D · #55 06-12-2009

I got caught a year ago in my van. It was a few days before Xmas

. I was doing 59 in a 60 ( for cars ). Middle of nowhere, no option for a course, just £60 and 3 points.

Wa***rs

Lee · #56 07-12-2009

To be honest, its not a wind up, and the police dont have the car on camera or footage of any recorded speed they only have the speed of their own car, so a solicitor does have a good argument.

I cant really say too much on the case as i dont want to incriminate anyone

DCM · #57 07-12-2009

to be honest, there can be argument if it is marginal, but that much, you can't really argue.

Lee · #58 07-12-2009

but dangerous driving is for the prosecution to prove, if they cannot see the car with a camera then how can the human eye see it, it was also at 3am in the morning so all they would have seen is a pair or red lights.

mikeyscott · #59 07-12-2009

Quote:

Originally Posted by T4miy4 Guy

I resently got caught but i was doing 39 in a 30 zone

Took the option a a driving course and fine

Completed the 4 hour course (which was a good refresher as its been 16 years since i passed my test and even tho i went into the course with a negative attitude ,i came out and felt they had taught me something)

regarding this tho 140 is ridiculous in a 30 zone

Andy

Me too, got the letter last week 36 in a 30. Will be doing the course and sitting up. I'm not excessive, but I do need to slow down.

if this is all true, enjoy the hotel and life changing event. Don't be such a fool.

Think I'll take a police officers version, rather than the person speeding away....

Wonder what the sponsors will be making of this.... I'd cancel the contracts..

Lee · #60 07-12-2009

Did i say it was me?