Go Back   oOple.com Forums > Car Talk > Team Losi Racing

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #281  
Old 03-04-2011
jamesmorl jamesmorl is offline
New Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 20
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by frogger View Post
The guys at Taplow on Friday were running 3 or 3.5 degree HRC blocks with around 3 degrees anti squat. I only had a 4.5 degree HRC block and it was way too much so I'll be getting 3 and 3.5.

I am very new to indoor racing and to be honest i am struggling to keep up now with all the advice on setups

So my question is subjective i know but can you experianced guys give me the changes you would make to my stock 22 built as per instructions for Taplow please.

Many Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #282  
Old 03-04-2011
frogger's Avatar
frogger frogger is offline
Mad Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,001
Default

Friday at Taplow was the first time I ran my 22 and my setup is not yet 100% dialed so take from it what you will. Shortening the wheelbase made a big improvement for that track. The rear was still stepping out a bit in the corners (possibly due to the 4.5 degree rear toe in). Good steering generally but would very much like a bit of more on power steering.

Mid motor
Front:
Stock pistons/27.5W/Green spring
Shock mounting on tower middle and wishbone middle holes
Camber link 1-A, no spacers
Camber -2 (will try -1 to -1.5 next time)
Toe 0
Narrow Yellow Mini pins with 2 outside rows cut off

Rear
Short wheelbase
Stock pistons/27.5W/Orange spring
Shock mounting on tower middle and wishbone inner holes
Camber link 2-C, 2mm spacers by the tower and 3mm by the rear hub
Camber -2
Toe 4.5 HRC block (will go down to 3 degrees I recon or maybe 3.5)
Anti squat 3 degrees
Yellow Mini pins

50g weight on the rear
74gr weight under the short lipo
Novak Ballistic 6.5 with 19t pinion and stock spur
Ride height wishbones level
Reply With Quote
  #283  
Old 03-04-2011
Gnarly Old Dog's Avatar
Gnarly Old Dog Gnarly Old Dog is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: A Small Insignificant Blue Green Planet
Posts: 571
Default

Defo reduce your rear toe if you want more on-power steering.

Or maybe lengthen the rear link by running in the 1 position on the camber block?
Reply With Quote
  #284  
Old 03-04-2011
PaulUpton PaulUpton is offline
Mad Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Northampton
Posts: 1,297
Default

For more power on steering I'd reduce anti squat to 2'. Will give less weight transfer to rear end, will however give a bit more off power steering too

Was helping people on Saturday on moto arena and that was one thing that made a signifficant difference

And drill out the pistons, 56 front with 2 extra at 55 and 55 rear with 2 extra at 54. 30w front 27.5w rear. Cars I've felt with kit pistons just feel dead on the table.
__________________
PR Racing - Insideline Racing - Zen Racing - GForce - PureRC - Puppy Paint
Reply With Quote
  #285  
Old 03-04-2011
tony12795 tony12795 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 909
Default

Oops, sorry I ment 2-B


Quote:
Originally Posted by Gnarly Old Dog View Post
I'd agree with Tony except I prefer 2-B (2 being the outer hole on the camber block and 1 being the inner)
I went from 2-C to 2-B yesterday and felt that the car was more consistent. On new tyres, the difference isn't massive but as the tyres wore, I felt the rear end was working to generate more grip during the turn with the link in the B position on the hub as opposed to the C position.
HTH
__________________
http://insidelineracing.co.uk
Reply With Quote
  #286  
Old 03-04-2011
jamesmorl jamesmorl is offline
New Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 20
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by frogger View Post
Friday at Taplow was the first time I ran my 22 and my setup is not yet 100% dialed so take from it what you will. Shortening the wheelbase made a big improvement for that track. The rear was still stepping out a bit in the corners (possibly due to the 4.5 degree rear toe in). Good steering generally but would very much like a bit of more on power steering.

Mid motor
Front:
Stock pistons/27.5W/Green spring
Shock mounting on tower middle and wishbone middle holes
Camber link 1-A, no spacers
Camber -2 (will try -1 to -1.5 next time)
Toe 0
Narrow Yellow Mini pins with 2 outside rows cut off

Rear
Short wheelbase
Stock pistons/27.5W/Orange spring
Shock mounting on tower middle and wishbone inner holes
Camber link 2-C, 2mm spacers by the tower and 3mm by the rear hub
Camber -2
Toe 4.5 HRC block (will go down to 3 degrees I recon or maybe 3.5)
Anti squat 3 degrees
Yellow Mini pins

50g weight on the rear
74gr weight under the short lipo
Novak Ballistic 6.5 with 19t pinion and stock spur
Ride height wishbones level
Thanks for that frogger. Will make the changes to mine and then see how it feels and go from there. Being so new to all this the info on here is fantastic so thank you everyone for helping me out.

James
Reply With Quote
  #287  
Old 04-04-2011
Oliv996's Avatar
Oliv996 Oliv996 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Paris - France
Posts: 246
Default

Don't know if such a table has already been released, BTW here is mine

__________________
http://www.mid44.com/
Reply With Quote
  #288  
Old 04-04-2011
reg's Avatar
reg reg is offline
*SuPeRsTaR mEmBeR*
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,276
Default

what figure do we need to be aiming for and how do you work it out,
thanks
__________________





TRADE FEED BACK.... http://www.oople.com/forums/showthread.php?t=34486
Reply With Quote
  #289  
Old 04-04-2011
steveproracing steveproracing is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 493
Default

The figure you desire is usually a ball park ratio that can be tweaked from track to track. the best place to start with is often found on your motors instruction sheet or the motor manufacturers web site. There is usually a recommended ratio chart referencing winds and class raced.


hth
__________________
proracing
Moss Models
Associated
Reedy
DJ KIRKY
Reply With Quote
  #290  
Old 07-04-2011
B4 Sloth's Avatar
B4 Sloth B4 Sloth is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Essex
Posts: 329
Default

Quick question.I have got the 4.5 hrc block. What recommendation for the shim and squat settings as a base??
Reply With Quote
  #291  
Old 07-04-2011
frogger's Avatar
frogger frogger is offline
Mad Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,001
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by B4 Sloth View Post
Quick question.I have got the 4.5 hrc block. What recommendation for the shim and squat settings as a base??
Where are you driving it, what surface?
Reply With Quote
  #292  
Old 10-04-2011
Oliv996's Avatar
Oliv996 Oliv996 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Paris - France
Posts: 246
Default

I made my own tapered pistons based on kit pistons:


On high grip grass track, my 22 mid motor seem much consistent with:
- 6x#56 holes piston / 35WT / pink spring on rear
- 6x#57 holes piston / 35WT / green spring on front

Thiner oil (30WT or 32.5WT) could be even better
__________________
http://www.mid44.com/
Reply With Quote
  #293  
Old 10-04-2011
Oliv996's Avatar
Oliv996 Oliv996 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Paris - France
Posts: 246
Default

I confirm, I tested this afternoon the setup with:
- 6x#56 holes piston / 30WT / yellow spring on rear
- 6x#57 holes piston / 35WT / green spring on front
is even better and combine with long rear camber links the rear end is really predictible out the corners.
__________________
http://www.mid44.com/
Reply With Quote
  #294  
Old 10-04-2011
hansie hansie is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 186
Default 22 setup advice needed for clay

Hallo all,

I run the 22 on a clay track with medium grip levels
After running about 20 packs I ended up with the setup
below (rear motor), I have 100 grams of weight under
my lipo.

Rear:
Oil 25 wt
piston 57 2 extra holes drilled
3 mm limiters
camberlink short
2mm spacer under ballstud on the hub
no spacer under ballstud on de tower
damper in the middle hole on the tower.
damper in the middle hole on the arm
4 degrees LRC toe in blok
0 degrees antisquat
rideheight arms level
1 degree negative camber
rear hub forward


Front:
oil 20 wt
piston 54
3 mm limiters in the damper
camberlink long
2mm spacer under ballstud on the spindle
1mm spacer under ballstud on the tower
damper in the middle hole on the tower.
damper in the outer hole on the arm
Rideheight level
thin kick up shim
1 degree toe in
2 degrees negative camber
10 degree caster blok

The car was able to do some fast laps with this
setup but it constantly feels on edge.
I can't throw the car around, it has grip but looses
it without warning.
Forward traction is allright as long as the car is
perfectly level, I can't get on the gas mid corner.
It steps out violently.
it jumps allright and the steering is ok.
I just don't have traction in the turns and coming
out of the turns. If I drive point and shoot style
and if I have the patience to wait untill the car is
level it is quick but like I said, allmost impossible
to drive faultlessly for 6 minutes. I drove someones
Tamiya 201 for a direct comparison and I was shocked
how much easier this car was to drive.

Does anyone have any suggestions?


Hans
Reply With Quote
  #295  
Old 10-04-2011
Dalton's Avatar
Dalton Dalton is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Teeside
Posts: 421
Default

You considered running it mid motor option ? get a comparison..
Reply With Quote
  #296  
Old 10-04-2011
ashleyb4's Avatar
ashleyb4 ashleyb4 is offline
Spends too long on oOple ...
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Oswestry
Posts: 6,141
Default

Here is what i ran today at Oswestry defently considering tapered pistons. Car was very good but defently felt it could be better.



Ash
__________________
Ashley Williams

I always thought by 2013 we would have flying cars, but we have got blankets with sleeves!

Reply With Quote
  #297  
Old 11-04-2011
hansie hansie is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 186
Default mid motor on clay

Hello all,

Someone gave the suggestion of running the 22 in mid
motor config on clay (medium grip), has anyone tried this?
I built it rear because I figured that was the best configuration
voor those conditions.
I'm having rear grip issues currently, sounds to me like those issues
will become bigger in mid motor configuration.
But I guess it's worth a try.

Hans
Reply With Quote
  #298  
Old 11-04-2011
frogger's Avatar
frogger frogger is offline
Mad Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,001
Default

My updated setup for Taplow as I ran the car on Friday night.

Front:
Stock pistons/27.5W/Blue spring
Shock mounting on tower middle and wishbone middle holes
Camber link 1-A, no spacers
Camber -1.5
Toe 0
Narrow Yellow Mini pins with 2 outside rows cut off, green stubby inserts (big one cut in half)

Rear
Short wheelbase
Stock pistons/27.5W/Orange spring
Shock mounting on tower middle and wishbone inner holes
Camber link 2-C, 2mm spacers by the tower and 3mm by the rear hub
Camber -2
Toe 3 HRC block
Anti squat 3 degrees
Yellow Mini pins, green stubby inserts

Mid motor configuration
Wing standard
50g weight on the rear
74gr weight under the short lipo
Novak Ballistic 6.5 with 19t pinion and stock spur
Ride height wishbones level
Servo: Spektrum 6070
Sanwa 2.4ghz rx

Notes: Car was well balanced and consistent. Good drive out of the corners and better on power steering. Want to try a 3.5HRC block next and the shocks still need rebuilding due to O ring stiction.
Reply With Quote
  #299  
Old 11-04-2011
Wacker 2's Avatar
Wacker 2 Wacker 2 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 319
Default

Has anyone found any good replacement low friction O rings to replace the standard ones???

I dont have much love for the standard kit ones as I'm finding it difficult to get the same feel left to right... even without the oil in them you can feel the restriction caused by the Kit O rings.

Jon!
Reply With Quote
  #300  
Old 11-04-2011
ottoswe ottoswe is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Helsingborg, Sweden
Posts: 79
Default

Hans, my guess is that you will get even bigger problems with mid motor on clay..

try dustins setup from tlracing.com.. works great.

arnaud on petitrc is gonna post my EOS setup.. pretty similar to evans setup from low grip clay.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
oOple.com