|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Slim 2
Can anyone tell me anything about the Slim 2 ?
any spy shots Jimmy ? |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Rob there are some photos of the two Slim2 prototypes on Racechat .
__________________
Jonathan | Atomic-Carbon |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
LOL
Nudey pics ? I think I might know where now ... <scuttles off> |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
slim 2 looks nice
__________________
Who am I fooling? I love oOple
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Call me stupid and slap my knackers! I can't find the pics anywhere - got a link to them?
__________________
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
The slim2 is a long term project like the Slim4, which has been in development for over 1 year, so the slim2 is at a early stage
__________________
Jonathan | Atomic-Carbon |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
more pics here http://www.doughtyuk.net/forum/index...opic=1743&st=0
:eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek: That car is SWEEEEEEET
__________________
Who am I fooling? I love oOple
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
i cant get on race chat, so it would be nice to see the pics on here me thinks,
__________________
Mattys the driver,my names carl
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
lol, oops thanks for that
__________________
Who am I fooling? I love oOple
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
Photos of the two current Slim2's with diffrent cell layouts, please note that these are the 1st builds off autocad, so i would guess once i have decided which cell layout to go with, they would change from these photos. But early days yet.
__________________
Jonathan | Atomic-Carbon |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
thats very good Excellent quality, although that spur gear has an output stuck out, will that be removed?
__________________
Who am I fooling? I love oOple
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
Jonathan, which layout is the favourite at the moment?
G
__________________
Graham North http://www.atomic-carbon.co.uk https://www.facebook.com/atomiccarbon https://www.facebook.com/nortechracing |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
I like Spec A layout most but wouldn't that mean you would need cells for 2wd and 4wd?....if you ran slim 2+4.
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
Spec B looks like it would be better ballanced to me.
Mmmm, interesting.... G
__________________
Graham North http://www.atomic-carbon.co.uk https://www.facebook.com/atomiccarbon https://www.facebook.com/nortechracing |
#18
|
||||
|
||||
I like the idea of having a *top deck on the spec B* spec B looks better IMO
__________________
Who am I fooling? I love oOple
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
spec A has a top deck too though?
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
I like Spec B, but the placement seems to be too far back and not enough weight at the front to give additional steering.
All the weight towards the rear, cells + motor could make the car handle bad when traction is low as it could make the car want to 'swing' more. Spec A seems to have abit more weight further forward, and more centralised than B. but as already said surely you would need two lots of cells to run both the S2+4? |
|
|