Go Back   oOple.com Forums > General > Electrics

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 27-02-2014
SlowOne SlowOne is offline
Mad Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,549
Default Updated rules for use of LiPo sacks - please read

Following changes to the way people are using their LiPos, the BRCA Electric Board have issued the following guidance, and a change to General Rule 4. This means that the new rule applies immediately to all Electric Sections.

SAFETY PROCEDURES WHEN CHARGING/DISCHARGING LiPo/LiFe BATTERIES.

To ALL BRCA Electric Sections, 27.02.14.

Recent communications received have indicated that some competitors are discharging LiPo batteries using a high discharge current between races.
Whilst most of the current batteries are stated to have a 'C' rating that will accommodate this practice, we have to consider that a chemical change is taking place within the battery and of course we cannot rely on the often 'inflated' figures seen on Lipo labels.

If a LiPo flames whilst it is being discharged during a race, then it is unlikely to hurt anything other than the track surface.
If it happens whilst discharging on a pit-table, then the safety concerns take on an entirely different perspective.

Therefore in the interest of safety, BRCA General Rule 4 will be updated to require that :-

"All LiPo/LiFe drive batteries must be in a 'closed' LiPo sack when being charged or discharged. This applies to any discharging procedures, except during a race or when using organiser supplied resistors to correct voltage".

This procedure applies with immediate effect.

As General Rules apply to all Sections, this amendment must be enforced in all Electric Sections.

Best regards,
Paul Worsley. (Secretary, BRCA Electric Board).
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 27-02-2014
russmini's Avatar
russmini russmini is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Worcs
Posts: 520
Send a message via MSN to russmini
Default

Why not:

No Discharging is allowed at a Race Meeting. Other than the natural process that happens whilst racing. Also if Scrutineering deems to high voltage.

And

Charging must be confined to a LiPo Sack and any openings, fully closed/sealed.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 27-02-2014
RudolfXC RudolfXC is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 539
Default

If in your final your car breaks near the start of the race, you need to discharge to leave in storage so banning is not practical.
__________________
Please leave feeback at

http://www.oople.com/forums/showthread.php?t=80777
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 27-02-2014
Chris-S Chris-S is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Leamington Spa
Posts: 432
Default

When will we see some form of official lipo sack testing, where lipo sacks must meet a minimum standard, rather than hoping that the £15 you've spent might keep a lipo fire contained.
__________________
Kyosho RB6
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 27-02-2014
mark christopher's Avatar
mark christopher mark christopher is offline
Spends too long on oOple ...
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: haxey, doncaster
Posts: 7,787
Send a message via MSN to mark christopher
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by russmini View Post
Why not:

No Discharging is allowed at a Race Meeting. Other than the natural process that happens whilst racing. Also if Scrutineering deems to high voltage.

And

Charging must be confined to a LiPo Sack and any openings, fully closed/sealed.
how do you police weather their being charged or discharged?

stock classes are now discharging at up to 40 amps then charging at anywhere around 10 amps.

you don't need a sack to take off surface charge as document.
__________________
MBModels - Schumacher Racing - Vapextech.co.uk - MRT - Savox - SMD
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 27-02-2014
danDanEFC's Avatar
danDanEFC danDanEFC is offline
Mad Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Crosby, Merseyside
Posts: 1,022
Send a message via MSN to danDanEFC
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mark christopher View Post

stock classes are now discharging at up to 40 amps then charging at anywhere around 10amps.
Does anyone now why these weirdos do such things?

Why are the on-road guys such crazy cheats?
__________________
Aidan Burke - Southport Radio Car Club
#SchumacherFamily #TQmodels #ExtraLapRCpodcast
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 28-02-2014
mark christopher's Avatar
mark christopher mark christopher is offline
Spends too long on oOple ...
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: haxey, doncaster
Posts: 7,787
Send a message via MSN to mark christopher
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by danDanEFC View Post
Does anyone now why these weirdos do such things?

Why are the on-road guys such crazy cheats?
Yes I know why and it does not make those doing it cheats, unless you can show that in any written ruling....
1c charge rate is a guideline, not a rule, and Defo no discharge rule.
__________________
MBModels - Schumacher Racing - Vapextech.co.uk - MRT - Savox - SMD
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 28-02-2014
Justingt5's Avatar
Justingt5 Justingt5 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Northampton, UK
Posts: 164
Default

Am I missing something here? Why would anyone want to discharge the lipos so they can then charge them again?? I thought they were MEMORYLESS batteries? surely its faster and safer to just keep them topped up between heats?
__________________
www.TeamKirk.co.uk | http://www.rprcdistribution.com | TEKNO SCT410.3 | SCHUMACHER KF2 | http://www.racing-cars.com/
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 28-02-2014
danDanEFC's Avatar
danDanEFC danDanEFC is offline
Mad Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Crosby, Merseyside
Posts: 1,022
Send a message via MSN to danDanEFC
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mark christopher View Post
Yes I know why and it does not make those doing it cheats, unless you can show that in any written ruling....
1c charge rate is a guideline, not a rule, and Defo no discharge rule.
This reply makes me happy to not be involved with stock/on road racing.

If covering your radio in petrol and setting fire to it made you 0.5secs quicker than the other guy these guys would do it.

__________________
Aidan Burke - Southport Radio Car Club
#SchumacherFamily #TQmodels #ExtraLapRCpodcast
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 28-02-2014
KRob's Avatar
KRob KRob is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Swingrove
Posts: 608
Default

There is a train of thought that when using the spec class motors (in blinky remember) the cells are not getting a strong 'work out' and that consistently only using around a third of the capacity means that the best are not being got from the cells.
For info, I only use about 2600mah in an 8 minute race doing 13.5t 12th circuit. The GT12's will be less as they only race 5 minutes.
If discharging a pack at a higher rate keeps the cell in better condition to give better performance then people are going to want to do it.

With brushless and Lipo technology reasonably settled now it's about marginal gains in motor limited classes so whether or not it actually makes a difference is still up in the air - but until people are sure they will try it to see.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 28-02-2014
mark christopher's Avatar
mark christopher mark christopher is offline
Spends too long on oOple ...
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: haxey, doncaster
Posts: 7,787
Send a message via MSN to mark christopher
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Justingt5 View Post
Am I missing something here? Why would anyone want to discharge the lipos so they can then charge them again?? I thought they were MEMORYLESS batteries? surely its faster and safer to just keep them topped up between heats?
Its nothing to do with memory effect.
__________________
MBModels - Schumacher Racing - Vapextech.co.uk - MRT - Savox - SMD
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 28-02-2014
mark christopher's Avatar
mark christopher mark christopher is offline
Spends too long on oOple ...
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: haxey, doncaster
Posts: 7,787
Send a message via MSN to mark christopher
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by danDanEFC View Post
This reply makes me happy to not be involved with stock/on road racing.

If covering your radio in petrol and setting fire to it made you 0.5secs quicker than the other guy these guys would do it.

A little narrow minded, there are no safety issues being broken, all done withing the manufactures specs, some thing I can guarantee you and others did not do when you charged NiMH....
__________________
MBModels - Schumacher Racing - Vapextech.co.uk - MRT - Savox - SMD
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 28-02-2014
mark christopher's Avatar
mark christopher mark christopher is offline
Spends too long on oOple ...
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: haxey, doncaster
Posts: 7,787
Send a message via MSN to mark christopher
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KRob View Post
There is a train of thought that when using the spec class motors (in blinky remember) the cells are not getting a strong 'work out' and that consistently only using around a third of the capacity means that the best are not being got from the cells.
For info, I only use about 2600mah in an 8 minute race doing 13.5t 12th circuit. The GT12's will be less as they only race 5 minutes.
If discharging a pack at a higher rate keeps the cell in better condition to give better performance then people are going to want to do it.

With brushless and Lipo technology reasonably settled now it's about marginal gains in motor limited classes so whether or not it actually makes a difference is still up in the air - but until people are sure they will try it to see.
Around 1600 to 1800 from a 6700 pack in gt12 for me, the discharge warms the pack to lower the ir
__________________
MBModels - Schumacher Racing - Vapextech.co.uk - MRT - Savox - SMD
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 28-02-2014
RobW RobW is offline
Mad Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,204
Default

The other reason may be to do with lipos working better when they are warm which discharging them at high rates can achieve. I do remember being at very cold winter touring car meetings back when I did on-road and cold lipos did not perform as well at the start of races – this was in stock class, 13.5T I think. I guess there must be some temperature window where they are at their best?


Rob
__________________
____________________________
Rob Warren
Yokomo Cal3.1
Yokomo YZ4 SF2
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 28-02-2014
RobW RobW is offline
Mad Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,204
Default

Spent too long typing - Mark made virtually same point but much more efficiently!
__________________
____________________________
Rob Warren
Yokomo Cal3.1
Yokomo YZ4 SF2
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 28-02-2014
fidspeed's Avatar
fidspeed fidspeed is offline
Mad Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,288
Default

originally flying with early variants of lipos in aircraft early mornng flights in the winter would be limited to stooging around with limited performance

yet after 1 flight and some discharge during the flight (which in turn incurred some warming of the lipo ) then a recharge the performance would be markedly improved
so warming the lipo from whatever means can give a performance increase


dave
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 28-02-2014
zoaman's Avatar
zoaman zoaman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: south wales
Posts: 498
Default

so why not make the rule.Anytime a lipo battery is connected to a charging unit it must be in a sealed fire proof containment. this will eliminate charging, discharging or even checking volts amps checking.easy to police then.
__________________
Current rides N slides and flies sponsored by

http://www.westernvalleymodels.co.uk/

  • TLR 22-4
  • TEAM C TM4
  • LOSI MINI 8 FULLY HOPPED UP
  • GT12 S1
  • HPI FIRE STORM
  • TRAXXAS KEN BLOCK GYMKANHA
  • Carisma Nissan Skyline GT
  • DJI P3
  • FIRDBIRD STRATOS
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 28-02-2014
SlowOne SlowOne is offline
Mad Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zoaman View Post
so why not make the rule.Anytime a lipo battery is connected to a charging unit it must be in a sealed fire proof containment. this will eliminate charging, discharging or even checking volts amps checking.easy to police then.
Because I could equally discharge the cell on a resistor... which is not a charger... We thought of that!

We don't want it in a sealed container as the LiPo fire involves rapidly expanding gasses. That expansion would pressurise the container which would eventually either explode, or require disposal as a pressurised container. If you relieve the pressure the noxious fumes escape... see below.

We don't want it in a LiPo locker because we can't access the LiPo with sand to extinguish it. The locker relives the pressure by releasing all the noxious gasses into the atmosphere, and without access for the sand to extinguish it, this goes on for many minutes. In a confined hall that would mean evacuation and then measuring the fume levels before we go back in.

In our classes we usually have less than ten seconds covering every ten drivers. When the battery performs better (see post above about flying in the cold) it can shave 0.2s off a lap. Multiply that by the 35-ish laps we do in eight minutes and we have a time improvement of seven seconds, or getting into the higher final.

In sorting this out with the EB and the Exec, we are talking about a handful of people who do this. It isn't widespread, and it isn't something the top ten drivers have done at the two meetings I have checked.

Honestly, it is something the middle order drivers do because they think the top drivers are doing it and they have to do it to keep up. As someone said on this thread or the other one, a few missed apexes and the advantage vanishes.

One thing I can tell you does work. If you are using LiPos in the controlled blinky classes and getting a lot of low-value discharges, then discharging the LiPo to 3.6v and charging it does improve the performance. I do it once after every meeting with each cell at about 1.5C and it works. At the meeting I use the cell without discharge and charge at about 1C or less.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 28-02-2014
mark christopher's Avatar
mark christopher mark christopher is offline
Spends too long on oOple ...
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: haxey, doncaster
Posts: 7,787
Send a message via MSN to mark christopher
Default

ill pm you with some top 12th drivers that do it all the time
__________________
MBModels - Schumacher Racing - Vapextech.co.uk - MRT - Savox - SMD
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 28-02-2014
SlowOne SlowOne is offline
Mad Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,549
Default

Not on the chargers they have - 20A is the most an LRP will do! I was talking about the 40A merchants, and the top drivers I know don't have equipment to go to 40A. 10A is 1.5C these days for our cells, so hardly in the realms of the 40A merchants doing it to raise cell temp for best performance.

If you feel their cells before they race, they are room temp, so not getting any advantage from a warm cell to lower IR, etc. I know some discharge, but not at 40A which is where you get the real advantage... or so people think...
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
oOple.com