Go Back   oOple.com Forums > Car Talk > Hot Bodies / HPI

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #201  
Old 09-02-2007
FifteenthNeo FifteenthNeo is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Thatcham, Berkshire
Posts: 170
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ron Burgundy View Post

If its a BJ4WE you want, buy one.. They look better, they are original and the guys who make them are awesome
With all due respect to JConcepts who indeed make a great buggy and yourself (im not flaming, just airing an opinion ), where in your statement do you mention how well the BJ4WE drives. Look at the real world where we have the Jaguar X type. This apitamy of british engineering is using a Ford Mondeo chassis (not that there's anything wrong with the Mondeo)
And look at the B4 and XXX CR both 2WD buggies that, although not identical, have very similar layouts.

If its a good design, why not make a variation of it. Afterall, when a D4 crosses the finish line infront of a BJ4WE, which it obviously will at some point given the law of averages, are you gonna say the BJ4WE has had its day.

Just my 10 penneth's worth.
Reply With Quote
  #202  
Old 09-02-2007
Nick Goodall's Avatar
Nick Goodall Nick Goodall is offline
*SuPeRsTaR mEmBeR*
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Newbury, Berkshire
Posts: 2,161
Default

It's the same with F1 - To the untrained average person the entire grid of F1 cars probably looks identical but with different colours, yet one will be 3-5 seconds a lap faster then another, so tiny differences = big differences on track.

You could also argue that the Cat 3000 was the first with this layout, and actually the Losi XX4 was the first 4wd competitive car to have a motor anywhere near the front of the car, this was a massive difference to previous 4wd off road cars but is almost the norm now!

Things change and improve all the time as the years go by, it's called Evolution

We're at the stage where these cars are all so good now, it's only small changes that are being made to gain every last 1/10th of a second. If you look at for instance the first Losi JRX, then the XX, XXCR, then the XXX, BK2, CR - They're fundamentally the same "design / layout" but with Geometry and slight weight distribution changes over the years hence Evolving into the current XXXCR that people are running today.
Reply With Quote
  #203  
Old 09-02-2007
Lee Martin's Avatar
Lee Martin Lee Martin is offline
LeeOtard
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,965
Default

nicks spot on....

even moving the cells mm's in different places will massively alter the cars handle. i feel. so theres no end to the amount of stuff they can do. but it will also 'look' like a BJ4 with that layout, but may not go like one....i.e, Academy??
Reply With Quote
  #204  
Old 09-02-2007
Adam Skelding's Avatar
Adam Skelding Adam Skelding is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Chesterfield
Posts: 784
Send a message via AIM to Adam Skelding Send a message via MSN to Adam Skelding Send a message via Yahoo to Adam Skelding Send a message via Skype™ to Adam Skelding
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thad Garner View Post
I have a stack of D4 bodies…Muhahaha
Hook me up then Mr B to V.....
Or the slice of bread gets it!!!!!
And you get no more Kit Kat Chunkies
__________________
5 Time Oople Invernational SC Champion.

Powered by OptiPower

Do, or do not, there is no try!
Reply With Quote
  #205  
Old 10-02-2007
Andy Moore's Avatar
Andy Moore Andy Moore is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Sunny Florida
Posts: 358
Send a message via AIM to Andy Moore
Default

I constantly see the argument that this layout requires the buggy to look similar....but why do the parts appear almost identical. The front arms, caster blocks, c-hubs, center slipper assembly, etc all seem to be blatant copies, not Hot Bodies spin on this particular layout.
__________________
The American "Andy Moore"

| Kyosho America | kyoshoamerica.com | Team Orion | teamorion.com |Winning Edge Designs | wedjim.com | Jab Graphix | jabgraphix.com |
Reply With Quote
  #206  
Old 12-02-2007
Ron Burgundy's Avatar
Ron Burgundy Ron Burgundy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sweden
Posts: 244
Default

What Andy has said above is my exact point.....

It is a blatant rip off of the BJ4WE...

Evolution YES, copying the best car on the track at the moment and calling it an "EXCLUSIVE" I say NO!!!!!!

Its a shame and to be honest, is just a little bit wrong...

JConcepts have done the right thing and will continue to do so, so in a way Jason and Brad should be flattered that a company with the resources of HotBodies should basically take the blue prints and put their name on it...

Thats looking at it in a "glass half full" kinda way!

I dont think in a million years could HB back up there product the way JC do...
Reply With Quote
  #207  
Old 12-02-2007
Andy Moore's Avatar
Andy Moore Andy Moore is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Sunny Florida
Posts: 358
Send a message via AIM to Andy Moore
Default

Hot Bodies, Tamiya, and Yokomo all used BJ parts in their prototypes and use very similar looking production parts. Its true that some use them to a higher extent than others though. Two companies actually ordered parts through us.....
__________________
The American "Andy Moore"

| Kyosho America | kyoshoamerica.com | Team Orion | teamorion.com |Winning Edge Designs | wedjim.com | Jab Graphix | jabgraphix.com |
Reply With Quote
  #208  
Old 12-02-2007
jimmy's Avatar
jimmy jimmy is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Huddersfield
Posts: 10,047
Blog Entries: 6
Default

Hpi are a big company and can certainly get more drivers into 4WD and off road electric in general with this car. There is talk of the 'other' andy moore giving this car a race this year, which might turn some other touring car drivers onto this class of racing - good for everyone!
Reply With Quote
  #209  
Old 12-02-2007
Andy Moore's Avatar
Andy Moore Andy Moore is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Sunny Florida
Posts: 358
Send a message via AIM to Andy Moore
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jimmy View Post
Hpi are a big company and can certainly get more drivers into 4WD and off road electric in general with this car. There is talk of the 'other' andy moore giving this car a race this year, which might turn some other touring car drivers onto this class of racing - good for everyone!

Thats is definately the best outlook for this car, and if its able to do that, then great!
__________________
The American "Andy Moore"

| Kyosho America | kyoshoamerica.com | Team Orion | teamorion.com |Winning Edge Designs | wedjim.com | Jab Graphix | jabgraphix.com |
Reply With Quote
  #210  
Old 17-02-2007
Adam Skelding's Avatar
Adam Skelding Adam Skelding is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Chesterfield
Posts: 784
Send a message via AIM to Adam Skelding Send a message via MSN to Adam Skelding Send a message via Yahoo to Adam Skelding Send a message via Skype™ to Adam Skelding
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy Moore View Post
I constantly see the argument that this layout requires the buggy to look similar....but why do the parts appear almost identical. The front arms, caster blocks, c-hubs, center slipper assembly, etc all seem to be blatant copies, not Hot Bodies spin on this particular layout.
Please remind me where all this lot came from on the Original BJ4:

Castor Blocks & Knuckles (Losi).
Sipper: B4.
Front and Rear Wishbones: B4.
Drivetrain: TC3.

Hairs could be split all day on which came first, the chicken or the egg.

There are subtle differences all over the car.....
__________________
5 Time Oople Invernational SC Champion.

Powered by OptiPower

Do, or do not, there is no try!
Reply With Quote
  #211  
Old 17-02-2007
Richard Lowe Richard Lowe is offline
*SuPeRsTaR mEmBeR*
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,398
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adam Skelding View Post
Sipper: B4
The slipper was bespoke hehe
Reply With Quote
  #212  
Old 18-02-2007
BradR BradR is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 29
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adam Skelding View Post
Please remind me where all this lot came from on the Original BJ4:

Castor Blocks & Knuckles (Losi).
Sipper: B4.
Front and Rear Wishbones: B4.
Drivetrain: TC3.

Hairs could be split all day on which came first, the chicken or the egg.

There are subtle differences all over the car.....
Like you said, hairs could be split all day. I'm not going to dwell on the subject, but I want to point out the inaccuracies contained in your post:

Caster Blocks - JConcepts (they're not just Losi pieces made from aluminum, the dimensions are different)
Knuckles - Losi (correct)
Slipper - JConcepts (the design was similar to the B3 slipper, but the only common part was the center bushing)
Wishbones - B4 (correct)
Drivetrain - Modified TC3 (slipper input shaft, one-way drive cup, NTC3 outdrives, and machined housings)

With that said, it's not most important point. The original BJ4 was designed to use as many Associated parts as possible. The whole idea was to make an Associated based 4WD off-road car, because they don't make one themselves. We also buy those parts from Associated to package in our kits, so Associated gets recognition and profits from us using their parts. We didn't just copy and existing car, add some subtle differences, and put our name on it.
Reply With Quote
  #213  
Old 20-02-2007
jimmy's Avatar
jimmy jimmy is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Huddersfield
Posts: 10,047
Blog Entries: 6
Default

A higher res pic of the final car as sent by mr.Skelding

Reply With Quote
  #214  
Old 21-02-2007
stefke stefke is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 808
Default

Nice car, although the cheap looking plastic battery retainers ruin the CF look. Shame. Would it be that expensive to use CF for these parts like on the BJ4, TRF501, ...

Another thing : given my recent experiences with HPI cars, I would choose the BJ4 over this anytime if I wanted a shaft driven 4wd. It's branded Hotbodies, but they are essentially the same company as HPI and the drivetrain is taken from the HPI Pro4. I've seen some serious quality, design and reliability issues with recent HPI cars (the HPI Baja and MT2 come to mind).
Reply With Quote
  #215  
Old 21-02-2007
Adam Skelding's Avatar
Adam Skelding Adam Skelding is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Chesterfield
Posts: 784
Send a message via AIM to Adam Skelding Send a message via MSN to Adam Skelding Send a message via Yahoo to Adam Skelding Send a message via Skype™ to Adam Skelding
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stefke View Post
Nice car, although the cheap looking plastic battery retainers ruin the CF look. Shame. Would it be that expensive to use CF for these parts like on the BJ4, TRF501, ...

Another thing : given my recent experiences with HPI cars, I would choose the BJ4 over this anytime if I wanted a shaft driven 4wd. It's branded Hotbodies, but they are essentially the same company as HPI and the drivetrain is taken from the HPI Pro4. I've seen some serious quality, design and reliability issues with recent HPI cars (the HPI Baja and MT2 come to mind).
The gearboxes have been re-designed specifically for the Off-Road car.

Battery Retainers: Cheap looking, but ultimately stong.. C/F... Yes... possible.
price increase to the end user.....definate......performance advantage... negligable.
__________________
5 Time Oople Invernational SC Champion.

Powered by OptiPower

Do, or do not, there is no try!
Reply With Quote
  #216  
Old 21-02-2007
mark christopher's Avatar
mark christopher mark christopher is offline
Spends too long on oOple ...
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: haxey, doncaster
Posts: 7,787
Send a message via MSN to mark christopher
Default

Adam arnt the plastic ones moulded, giving a more secure battery mount?

did you see my post re your worksop date and clash?
__________________
MBModels - Schumacher Racing - Vapextech.co.uk - MRT - Savox - SMD
Reply With Quote
  #217  
Old 21-02-2007
Adam Skelding's Avatar
Adam Skelding Adam Skelding is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Chesterfield
Posts: 784
Send a message via AIM to Adam Skelding Send a message via MSN to Adam Skelding Send a message via Yahoo to Adam Skelding Send a message via Skype™ to Adam Skelding
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mark christopher View Post
Adam arnt the plastic ones moulded, giving a more secure battery mount?

did you see my post re your worksop date and clash?
Correct. They have moulded retainers holding the cells firmly in place, whether you have the cells in the forward or back position.
__________________
5 Time Oople Invernational SC Champion.

Powered by OptiPower

Do, or do not, there is no try!
Reply With Quote
  #218  
Old 21-02-2007
Nick Goodall's Avatar
Nick Goodall Nick Goodall is offline
*SuPeRsTaR mEmBeR*
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Newbury, Berkshire
Posts: 2,161
Default

I love the fact that nobody's really seen one in the flesh, let alone going round a track yet seem to pick holes in the weirdest / smallest things they can think of?? Is there some sort of conspiracy or something
Reply With Quote
  #219  
Old 21-02-2007
mark christopher's Avatar
mark christopher mark christopher is offline
Spends too long on oOple ...
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: haxey, doncaster
Posts: 7,787
Send a message via MSN to mark christopher
Default

think you may find adam has seen one!
__________________
MBModels - Schumacher Racing - Vapextech.co.uk - MRT - Savox - SMD
Reply With Quote
  #220  
Old 21-02-2007
Nick Goodall's Avatar
Nick Goodall Nick Goodall is offline
*SuPeRsTaR mEmBeR*
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Newbury, Berkshire
Posts: 2,161
Default

Really? Yes i know that, it's not Adam i'm talking about - it's the people that seem set on slagging the car before even seeing one in the flesh let alone out on track.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
oOple.com