New SV chassis - Page 3

Adam F · #41 13-01-2011

Quote:

I'll post a full setup tonight

Any luck with the MA setup?

I would really like to compare it with my current set up to see how it differs...

racingdwarf · #42 13-01-2011

Just to continue from my post on page one

Need a set up for ardent on sat, saw danny Magee's on schumacker site, thought YAY

.
Took one look

Trish bits weights front and rear,
Alloy box
New +8mm chassis and soft top deck
diffrent front link mount
cells moved back

well thats handy

,

Cockerill · #43 13-01-2011

I never got to a computer computer last night so it will probably be Monday now before I get it up.

Racingdrawf: I was at Ardent today and got a pretty good setup, using the standard chassis, plastic gearbox and 20g of stick on weights. If your about tomorrow Phil Booth has a copy or come and see me sat morning

racingdwarf · #44 13-01-2011

That would be just the job, I should think I will be finding you saturday am, as due to work I'm stuck home till then

.

fastinfastout · #45 21-01-2011

are schu going to be releasing the longer chassis in S1 composite material. Would prefer more flex than carbon.

Danny McGee · #46 21-01-2011

Quote:

Originally Posted by racingdwarf

Just to continue from my post on page one

Need a set up for ardent on sat, saw danny Magee's on schumacker site, thought YAY

.
Took one look

Trish bits weights front and rear,
Alloy box
New +8mm chassis and soft top deck
diffrent front link mount
cells moved back

well thats handy

,

That's what I was running. Sorry it wasn't much use. Seems to work well for me.

Its McGee by the way.

Hope Tom's was more use for you.

racingdwarf · #47 25-01-2011

Have to say Tom was a top bloke at Ardent, loads of help

Errrm

sorry Mr McGee, least I spelt danny right

mikeyscott · #48 22-04-2011

People still happy with the switch?

hazeandfizz · #49 22-04-2011

100%

johnb · #50 22-04-2011

Has Any one been running the 2mm soft chassis as remember one team driver was running it last time I spoke to him but has anyone else run it tested it and stuck with it.

hazeandfizz · #51 23-04-2011

John,

I ran the 2mm thick chassis before going +8mm. It wasn't a huge step for me at my level, not like going +8mm. Everyone is in favor of more flex and for sure it was not a negative step.

Regards,
James.

johnb · #52 23-04-2011

Hi James

Haven't seen you for a while chap but remember you swapped over to the 8mm chassis and you were going better with it than the standard one.

But I'm going to be running a cougar soon and going to try the 8mm at some point and thought about trying the 2mm soft one as well.

John

moth898 · #53 23-04-2011

I ran the 8 mm chassis yesterday in loose dirt with proline bowties, huge difference in traction and stability, but I did lose steering. Now I have to find more steering.

I can now hit the throttle and breaks without losing the rear...very happy with that.

johnb · #54 23-04-2011

I ran the 8 mm chassis yesterday in loose dirt with proline bowties, huge difference in traction and stability, but I did lose steering. Now I have to find more steering.

Yeah that's what I wonder when they brought out the 2mm soft chassis as you would still get the steering but a bit more flex.

So shall try out them both over time and see which best suits my driving.

moth898 · #55 23-04-2011

The 8mm chassis gives more rear weight bias where the soft chassis is to provide more traction on bumpy tracks, there is a difference in the two.

If you find the car has enough traction now and just want more stability in the rough stuff go to the soft chassis. If you don't have enough forward traction switching to the 8mm chassis will fix that.

hazeandfizz · #56 23-04-2011

John,

You are more than welcome to try my 2mm chassis.

Cheers,
James.

Quote:

Originally Posted by johnb

Hi James

Haven't seen you for a while chap but remember you swapped over to the 8mm chassis and you were going better with it than the standard one.

But I'm going to be running a cougar soon and going to try the 8mm at some point and thought about trying the 2mm soft one as well.

John

johnb · #57 23-04-2011

Yeah cheers James as will be at the Dms regional in may and will catch up with you then.

As bought the car 2nd hand off the for sale section on here the other day and don't know what the car has been run with so have a base set up I'm going to run straight away but would be good to try out the different chassis.

John

hazeandfizz · #58 23-04-2011

We can sort the setup out then.

Cheers,
James.

David Poulter · #59 23-04-2011

John

I have been running the 2mm thick standard length chassis for sometime now and find it the most suitable one for me. I found it gave the car slightly more flex and made it easier to drive in most conditions.

I have tried to +8mm one and personnaly was not that keen on it. Thats not to say that it wont work for many other drivers, i just prefer a slightly more agressive car. I am sure the longer chassis will be good on low grip tracks such as dirt or clay as the car will be much more predicable through corners. I know that a number of the other schumacher team drivers prefer the +8mm chassis.

If you have any other questions then please ask.

David

mikeyscott · #60 23-04-2011

Quote:

Originally Posted by johnb

I ran the 8 mm chassis yesterday in loose dirt with proline bowties, huge difference in traction and stability, but I did lose steering. Now I have to find more steering.

Yeah that's what I wonder when they brought out the 2mm soft chassis as you would still get the steering but a bit more flex.

So shall try out them both over time and see which best suits my driving.

Pm Steveb as he is selling a 2mm thick chassis as I think he decided on the 8mm chassis.

I've tested my SV today on standard chassis at the changed torch layout and liked it. So I am going to borrow an 8mm chassis and go from there. Equally I'm not a very good driver some may not notice the chassis change.