Go Back   oOple.com Forums > Car Talk > Team Losi Racing

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #341  
Old 26-04-2011
Chris56's Avatar
Chris56 Chris56 is offline
Mad Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 1,374
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fastinfastout View Post
I'm struggling to understand how going from 1 to 4 degree anti-squat gave you better forward traction!

how I understand it, if I want better traction coming out of a corner, or straight, I would want 0 or minimal anti-squat, to encourage the rear end to squat, hence more weight transfer, hence more rear traction. Maybe I'm in the wrong sport if I cannot understand a simple concept like antisquat!
According to the XXX-Cr manual, having more anti-squat will increase intital steering and forward traction. Running less anti squat (or even pro-squat) will give you more on-power steering
__________________
www.wbmcc.com
Reply With Quote
  #342  
Old 26-04-2011
steveproracing steveproracing is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 493
Default

The more antisquat the less the car squats under power

When accelerating weight transfers from front to rear. The less the car squats the more of that weight is transferred to the wheels, increasing forward traction
Squat absorbs quite abit of this weight transfer. Therefore the more the car squats the less weight is transferred to the wheels resulting in less forward drive!!


Less antisquat creates more sidebite as when the car squats in a corner centrifugal forces are greater causing more lateral weight change to load up the tyre creating more lateral grip from the tyre ( sidebite)


So to summerize.
More antisquat = more forward drive
Less antisquat =. More sidebite

Hth
__________________
proracing
Moss Models
Associated
Reedy
DJ KIRKY
Reply With Quote
  #343  
Old 26-04-2011
Reevsey Reevsey is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 263
Default

My lastest base set up

Front
20 deg kick up
10 deg caster
front link - long tower + 1mm spacer & 1mm spacer hub
Green Spring/35w/1.2mm 6 hole
Shock position middle wishbone Middle tower

Rear
1 deg anti squat
3.5 HRC deg toe in
short wheelbase
Rear link 2-C 2mm spacer tower 3mm spacer hub
rear roll bar 0.9mm
yellow spring/32.5w 1.3mm 6 hole
JC 7inch V wing full gurney

104g rudebits weight under lipo
50g losi rear weight kit

Si
__________________
Si Reeves - Herts Rc models - Schumacher - Beta - Spektrum - Rudebits.co.uk - SMD - Insideline Racing
Reply With Quote
  #344  
Old 26-04-2011
DCM's Avatar
DCM DCM is offline
Spends too long on oOple ...
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Marvelous South Wales!!
Posts: 8,896
Default

What is the difference between running 20' and 25' rake shim in the front?
__________________
dragon paints : team tekin : fusion hobbies :SCHUMACHER RACING : Nuclear R/C for all my sticky and slippery stuff - if it needs gluing or lubing, Nuclear RC is the man!
Reply With Quote
  #345  
Old 26-04-2011
Reevsey Reevsey is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 263
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DCM View Post
What is the difference between running 20' and 25' rake shim in the front?
It effects total caster 20 kick and 10 deg caster = 30 in total
It will handle in a different way than say 25 kick and 5 caster = 30 in total

This can change the front of the car alot
__________________
Si Reeves - Herts Rc models - Schumacher - Beta - Spektrum - Rudebits.co.uk - SMD - Insideline Racing
Reply With Quote
  #346  
Old 26-04-2011
DCM's Avatar
DCM DCM is offline
Spends too long on oOple ...
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Marvelous South Wales!!
Posts: 8,896
Default

I know that more rake/less caster will handle differently than less rake/more caster, more caster gives you more exit steering, less gives you more turn in, but what about rake?
__________________
dragon paints : team tekin : fusion hobbies :SCHUMACHER RACING : Nuclear R/C for all my sticky and slippery stuff - if it needs gluing or lubing, Nuclear RC is the man!
Reply With Quote
  #347  
Old 26-04-2011
Gnarly Old Dog's Avatar
Gnarly Old Dog Gnarly Old Dog is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: A Small Insignificant Blue Green Planet
Posts: 571
Default

Rake will affect the amount of weight shift forward under deceleration - just like anti squat but in reverse.
More rake = less weight shift forward
Less rake = more weight shift forward

This will be more noticeable on natural deceleration as opposed to hard braking (IMO)

I've changed from 20/10 to 25/5 and feel that the car doesn't load up in the corners quite so much and is easier to drive through and out.

Like Si says - worth playing with as it does have a noticeable effect.
Reply With Quote
  #348  
Old 26-04-2011
Dombrasky's Avatar
Dombrasky Dombrasky is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: southwest
Posts: 372
Default

Would more rake stop traction rolling? as on my first outing with the car i was having to drive slower to stop it rolling over,although it was hot and dry and i had new tyres
on, i could not drive as aggressively as i would normally with a b4
__________________
~Rick Evans~
~LRP~shark st ft~lwb~
~Carisma GT14B pro~
~Schumacher KF2~
~Schumacher Atom~
~BSR Basher-RallyX~
~Ascociated RC8.2e RallyX~
~TeamC T8EV3 RallyX~
phat bodies
worm-racing
http://www.mendiprcraceway.co.uk
Reply With Quote
  #349  
Old 26-04-2011
till till is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Stuttgart
Posts: 226
Default

could you explain rake and where i adjust it for somone who hasn´t got the best english =)
cheers
Till
__________________
The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has it´s limit´s.

TLR 22 "1.0"
Reply With Quote
  #350  
Old 26-04-2011
Mugenextreme's Avatar
Mugenextreme Mugenextreme is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Dublin / Ireland
Posts: 398
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DCM View Post
What is the difference between running 20' and 25' rake shim in the front?

Till, i may stand corrected but i think its to do with the kick Angle on the front of the car. Looking at the setup sheets it states Kick angle 20' 25' 30' which would tie in with what the lads are talking about above with the 20' and 25'.
Reply With Quote
  #351  
Old 26-04-2011
Gnarly Old Dog's Avatar
Gnarly Old Dog Gnarly Old Dog is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: A Small Insignificant Blue Green Planet
Posts: 571
Default

@Mugenextreme - 100% correct sir!

@Till - the rake is the front kick angle on the front wishbones. It is a functon of the bent angle on the chassis plate itself and the plastic spacer that fits between the chassis and the front pivot block. The flat plastic spacer does not alter the kick angle so it remains at the standard chassis 25 degree but the wedge plastic washer reduces the overall kick angle by 5 degrees to 20 degrees overall

@Dombrasky - I wouldn't have thought so. The difference that the kick angle has is (IMO) a fine tuning aid - traction roll would be caused by something more drastic. Post a little bit more about your setup and the track surface that you are running on and maybe someone here can help shed some light for you. Possibly also think what is different between your B4 and your 22 and maybe the answer will lie around there??
Reply With Quote
  #352  
Old 26-04-2011
steel's Avatar
steel steel is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: liverpool
Posts: 238
Send a message via MSN to steel
Default starting set up for batley

As above any help appreciated

Mark
Reply With Quote
  #353  
Old 26-04-2011
steveproracing steveproracing is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 493
Default

Look back at my setup on this thread. Approx 1 page back. It may look wrong on the damping but I have put many hours on this track with my 22. It really works. I know at least 3 batley regulars and 1 southport member that have switched to this and agree it's really easy to drive!!
__________________
proracing
Moss Models
Associated
Reedy
DJ KIRKY
Reply With Quote
  #354  
Old 26-04-2011
steel's Avatar
steel steel is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: liverpool
Posts: 238
Send a message via MSN to steel
Default

Cheers for that steve looks a lot different to my southport set up but i will give it a go

Mark
Reply With Quote
  #355  
Old 26-04-2011
steveproracing steveproracing is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 493
Default

Am sure it will be really different!! Batley at the min is really slippy. It's cut up on the grass and the astro is like ice!!
__________________
proracing
Moss Models
Associated
Reedy
DJ KIRKY
Reply With Quote
  #356  
Old 27-04-2011
fastinfastout fastinfastout is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 877
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by steveproracing View Post
The more antisquat the less the car squats under power

When accelerating weight transfers from front to rear. The less the car squats the more of that weight is transferred to the wheels, increasing forward traction
Squat absorbs quite abit of this weight transfer. Therefore the more the car squats the less weight is transferred to the wheels resulting in less forward drive!!


Less antisquat creates more sidebite as when the car squats in a corner centrifugal forces are greater causing more lateral weight change to load up the tyre creating more lateral grip from the tyre ( sidebite)


So to summerize.
More antisquat = more forward drive
Less antisquat =. More sidebite

Hth
Thank you for your 101 lesson in antisquat

I was always under the assumption that the more the rear squats, the more rear traction, but the opposite is true. You learn new things everyday!
Reply With Quote
  #357  
Old 27-04-2011
shark's Avatar
shark shark is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Notts
Posts: 632
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reevsey View Post
My lastest base set up

Front
20 deg kick up
10 deg caster
front link - long tower + 1mm spacer & 1mm spacer hub
Green Spring/35w/1.2mm 6 hole
Shock position middle wishbone Middle tower

Rear
1 deg caster
3.5 HRC deg toe in
short wheelbase
Rear link 2-C 2mm spacer tower 3mm spacer hub
rear roll bar 0.9mm
yellow spring/32.5w 1.3mm 6 hole
JC 7inch V wing full gurney

104g rudebits weight under lipo
50g losi rear weight kit

Si
Mornin Si just wondered what anti squat you run with the above set up ? Thanks
__________________
Bmcc .
Reply With Quote
  #358  
Old 27-04-2011
dirk702's Avatar
dirk702 dirk702 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Belgium (Deurne)
Posts: 479
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shark View Post
Mornin Si just wondered what anti squat you run with the above set up ? Thanks
And Mid motor or...
And Clay or...
__________________
Team LelijkeBodiesEnMismatchJanten
Ook op de Cougar SV2, Cat SX3 & Cat K1
Reply With Quote
  #359  
Old 27-04-2011
Dombrasky's Avatar
Dombrasky Dombrasky is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: southwest
Posts: 372
Default

[QUOTE=Gnarly Old Dog;494666
@Dombrasky - I wouldn't have thought so. The difference that the kick angle has is (IMO) a fine tuning aid - traction roll would be caused by something more drastic. Post a little bit more about your setup and the track surface that you are running on and maybe someone here can help shed some light for you. Possibly also think what is different between your B4 and your 22 and maybe the answer will lie around there [QUOTE]

Thinking more about what you said Gnarly,Im gonna try a longer front link and maybe 2mm under rear tower link to stop rear rotation
If this doesnt cure it, il post my setup,its on grass- astro by the way
__________________
~Rick Evans~
~LRP~shark st ft~lwb~
~Carisma GT14B pro~
~Schumacher KF2~
~Schumacher Atom~
~BSR Basher-RallyX~
~Ascociated RC8.2e RallyX~
~TeamC T8EV3 RallyX~
phat bodies
worm-racing
http://www.mendiprcraceway.co.uk
Reply With Quote
  #360  
Old 27-04-2011
Gnarly Old Dog's Avatar
Gnarly Old Dog Gnarly Old Dog is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: A Small Insignificant Blue Green Planet
Posts: 571
Default

Longer front link for sure . I run a long front link almost always - only going to a shorter one in the wet and slippery.

Also - 2mm under the link on the rear tower is a good move - but I do run the rear link short - with the outer in either the E position or the B - with 2 or 3mm under the ball stud at the wheel.

If you're running Schumacher minispike tyres - cutting an outer row off the rear will help reduce traction roll without affecting forward drive noticeably.

The other thing would be that the kit front spring is (IMO) far too soft for UK style high-bite tracks. I would recommend swapping this out for a green front spring to begin with - if your traction roll is induce by the front end being too soft (spring along with short front link), changing both of these might well get you a long way towards sorting the car initially for you.
HTH
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
oOple.com