|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Difference TRF 201 XM vs XMW
Hello, did any ody tested both vversions ? As the motor is more central positioned I assume the XM version is better suitable for high grip tracks?
Thx for inputs? Rudi |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Yes.
I don't have an XMW, but have an XR/XM. on a dusty track the XM was not good, but in XR guise it was brilliant. I'm going to run the XM soon at a carpet venue in Sydney. Will be my first time on high grip surface! XMW is on my to get list, but is elusive!
__________________
Regards, David Secretary/Treasurer Southern Highlands Off Road R/C Car Club Inc. (NSW Australia) http://shorrcccinfo.wix.com/shorrccc www.facebook.com/SHORRCCC |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Ive had both.
The XMW out of box is a far better kit. The only issue with handling is with which tires i need to run on the day. The XM i was forever struggling with rear end washing out or to much front end push. I run on a low - Med grip track
__________________
- TRF201XR - - TRF503 - - TRF801xt - |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
XMW is the better kit for all track conditions due to the ball diff & gear diff.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Now that I have run my XM on carpet, I have to say that is where it is meant to be. On a high grip surface the XM works very well. I was at no disadvantage to other kits on the night and found myself in the A Main (17.5 blinky) Q7 first time on carpet. Had some good results in the finals too. Highest was a second.
Going again tomorrow night.
__________________
Regards, David Secretary/Treasurer Southern Highlands Off Road R/C Car Club Inc. (NSW Australia) http://shorrcccinfo.wix.com/shorrccc www.facebook.com/SHORRCCC |
|
|