|
|
View Poll Results: Qualifying Format | |||
FTD |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
4 | 80.00% |
Round by Round |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1 | 20.00% |
Voters: 5. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
What qualifying format do people want at TORCH?
FTD or Round by round? I'd like to try round by round in the coming weeks. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I prefer FTD as it encourages me to try and and improve my overall time each run.
If I was winning my heat in round by round I think I would be more likely to pace myself to make sure I won the heat and therefore the round rather than push myself to improve my FTD. Might be different once we have more than one heat per class as the other heat might be quicker. Understand round by round is fairer when the track conditions change over the course of the meeting but once we get to the drier weather the track should not change too much?? Happy to give round by round a go though - variety is the spice of life and all that. Rob |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I've only do the round by round once at EPR and it worked well.
I suppose it adds a racing element a bit more to qualifying? |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I prefer round by round, it makes for a friendlier days racing. FTD can promote the win it or bin it style.
Just my 2 cents |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
To me Round by round rewards consistency in both driving and reliability of the car and FTD just rewards speed.
__________________
Schumacher KC, KD, CAT XLS, CAT L1 | Team C TM2 V2, TM4, TC02 | JQ The Car | Mugen MBX6 | Losi 8T,8BE 1.5 | Durango DEX-410V4 | FTX Blaze | XRAY M18T | Kyosho STR,Surf Dude,Nexus 30 | Nimrif Makara | MFA Spear | She Devil | T-Rex 450SEV2,250SE | Ark X-400 | Protech Butterfly,Zoom 400 | Ikarus Piccolo | VW T4 | Smart 450 | KC-250 | BoltRC Kraken 5" | Emax Nighthawk 250 | Gravity 250 | S550 | Prusa i3 | TronXY X5A | Must stop collecting stuff! |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I prefer round by round, it feels more relaxed and no pressure to put in a perfect run.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Did we not vote for this before?
I think it was won on FTD last time, it confuses some races when it keeps changing. Maybe it should be decided track side before we race on a vote and stick to it. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
No that was staggered starts. That still remains with round by round.
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Whatever qualifying format we do it will still be staggered starts
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
A vote trackside might be best or the poll voting we had last time perhaps? I will not be racing for a few weeks. |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() I've only done round by round once before and I can see Dave C's view were it makes it more relaxed and also rewards consistency. Equally I can see how it's fun to chase down the FTD time, but it's also a backside saver when you need to pull something out of the bag! |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It hasn't changed at all since last time.
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Only issues need to be raised is timing of sorting finals and the true benefit at small turn outs. With less than 30 driivers at general morning meets it will only seem to slow things down and confuse people. This will add benefit to all day meetings and championship meets. However our members will decide? |
![]() |
|
|