The Battery for 2008

[AmiSMB]

Now that the BRCA and EFRA have release the legal cells for the 2008 season which ones will become the most popular. As far as I can see we have had a GP phase and now an IB phase. Some are saying that the new Orion SHO cells do not seem to have enough go in them but I have noticed that recently every new car release picture seems to have a pack of them inside. I currently run EP but not many others seem to run these and they are now illegal ones as they are not the revised 2008 ones .

So what are the views of others on the which battery for 2008?

[Lee]

I have a pack of EP 4600`s and i prefer the IB4200 cells which are 9 months old they still seem to have more punch and feel to them.

Ill be getting more IB`s

Better the devil you know

[Southwell]

Im going to be running the new EnerG's, the spec for FT ones are: > Factory Team Grade (440+ Seconds / 1.23V+) I will post my specs when i receive them.

[AmiSMB]

Interesting I was thinking of the EnerG cells as well. Anyone else want to pitch in?

[JCJC]

Originally Posted by AmiSMB

but I have noticed that recently every new car release picture seems to have a pack of them inside. .

Remember that these were out early, before the list, tothers are still thin on the ground. I would not know who is supplying which, I have seen single Yuntong's on the Demon site.

[burgie]

[quote=AmiSMB;93393]Some are saying that the new Orion SHO cells do not seem to have enough go in them quote]

I saw a B44 on Sunday running the Orion cells, and believe me, they had all the "go" in the world in them....

[super__dan]

I'm looking forward to running the SMC EnerG's.

[jimmy]

Originally Posted by AmiSMB

Orion SHO cells do not seem to have enough go in them but I have noticed that recently every new car release picture seems to have a pack of them inside.

Product placement - car manufacturers get stuff like this free in return for showing it in their new cars to brain wash you

I'll happily participate in the brainwashing of people - but sadly I think any reviews I do will have my dog-eaten old cells in.

[ryan]

The new orion cells looked rather disapointing for the first 2/3 charges. After that they where taking around 4600mah after equalising them. I tryed a pack of these that had done a meeting and they have loads of power

[dan_kitty]

have just orded a set of yungtons from demon, will be intresting to see what they are like

[Nick Goodall]

POST FROM TRISH (He's on the phone to me)

The 4200 actually refers to 4200 mW/h which equates to 3800mah – Anyone that can work out a bit of electrical theory should be able to work that out. They have been labeled as 4200 but they’ve only done this so they can achieve legal cells (due to having to reduce the width) – I ran them all weekend with no problems and had loads of power, plenty of runtime and if anything I found them better then the IB4200’s.

Nowhere does it actually state 4200mah, so it’s a bit mis-leading but if you read carefully they are perfectly fine.

[Chris Green]

Is anyone assembling and matching SHO 4200's?

I can find loose cells, but not assembled ones?

Thanks

[MattW]

Chris, As far as i know, Schumacher, Peak and Orion are all matching the SHO EU cell (the legal one!), I know Schumacher have stock, and i know Horizon and Mirage have had stock, but no idea if they have them currently.

[Southwell]

Originally Posted by Southwell

Im going to be running the new EnerG's, the spec for FT ones are: > Factory Team Grade (440+ Seconds / 1.23V+) I will post my specs when i receive them.

Specs of my Team Almighty FT cells: 467sec @ 35amp, 1.235V, 1.4IR.

[Chris Doughty]

Originally Posted by Nick Goodall

POST FROM TRISH (He's on the phone to me)

The 4200 actually refers to 4200 mW/h which equates to 3800mah – Anyone that can work out a bit of electrical theory should be able to work that out. They have been labeled as 4200 but they’ve only done this so they can achieve legal cells (due to having to reduce the width) – I ran them all weekend with no problems and had loads of power, plenty of runtime and if anything I found them better then the IB4200’s.

Nowhere does it actually state 4200mah, so it’s a bit mis-leading but if you read carefully they are perfectly fine.

its like the GP4300 cell, it said in small text 4100mAh, they just called it a 4300 because IB had 4200mAh cells.

[losixxx]

Originally Posted by Southwell

Specs of my Team Almighty FT cells: 467sec @ 35amp, 1.235V, 1.4IR.

have you run them at all ian??

[Southwell]

Originally Posted by losixxx

have you run them at all ian??

Not yet mate, i hope to get to test them next weekend.

[super__dan]

Originally Posted by Southwell

Specs of my Team Almighty FT cells: 467sec @ 35amp, 1.235V, 1.4IR.

My SMC EnerG's arrived today 467sec@ 35Amp, 1.232V, 1.4IR

So pretty close then

Won't have mine built before the weekend so won't run them much before the first national. Hope they are as good as they look as they have a kind of carbon fibre effect which is good.

[Southwell]

Originally Posted by super__dan

My SMC EnerG's arrived today 467sec@ 35Amp, 1.232V, 1.4IR

So pretty close then

Won't have mine built before the weekend so won't run them much before the first national. Hope they are as good as they look as they have a kind of carbon fibre effect which is good.

Very close! I doubt ill notice any difference between my best and worst packs to be honist, the specs are so high they will be awesome no matter what!

[Chris Green]

So, what are the EnerG's like then? any good?