Go Back   oOple.com Forums > General > Electrics

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old 08-01-2012
VillageIdiot's Avatar
VillageIdiot VillageIdiot is offline
The gimp formerly known as LIP
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Manchester
Posts: 197
Default Lipo ''C'' rating debate

As all are aware many top brands and others offering performance lipos CLAIM to have high C ratings, 60, 70, 90, even 150.

When parting with £100 per Lipo shouldnt we be expecting them to provide evidence of there testing and results in their so called TRUE rating? this would make a huge inpact in the decent lipos and the ones with false ratings trying to shift lipos on false statements.

Ive just come across a lipo manafacture that ive never heard of, and on the resellers website goes like this....

KYPOM KT7000XP70 LiPo 7.4V 7000mAh 70C Hard Cased.

Latest 2012 technology
7000mAh capacity.
70C rated - TRUE rating. Lowest resistance.



Firstly whats this 2012 technology? secondly they claim TRUE rating.

Is there a way that the end user could measure C rating for themselves accuratly and then compare lipos on the market?


Rant over, Discuss.......
__________________
I am a fool. I speak utter garbage. Please add me to your ignore list.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
oOple.com