Go Back   oOple.com Forums > General > General Race Chat

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 16-09-2011
Apricot Slice Apricot Slice is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Aberdeen
Posts: 177
Default Whats the deal with the XXX4G+

Hi all,
Whats the deal with the XXX4G+
They are noted for not being so good on the bumpy stuff.
Why?
__________________
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 16-09-2011
colmo's Avatar
colmo colmo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Fermanagh, N. Ireland
Posts: 842
Send a message via MSN to colmo Send a message via Skype™ to colmo
Default

There's a few things about it (this is what I have read, not having had the car myself):

1) The chassis is very stiff indeed. That's not likely to be nice over bumps.

2) The motor is rather far back - in fact, the layout is the same as most modern touring cars. Most 4wd buggies have the motor much further forward - B44, FS2, DEX410, BMax4, TRF 502x, even the relatively similar TRF 511x all have the motor further forward.
__________________


Photos:
Oople Invernational 2010 - Sodden Sunday
Muchmore N. Irish GP 2010 (Touring cars)
BADMCC 1/8th Nitro buggies

Current cars:
X6^2 | JC BJ4WE | TM E4 & E4JS | HPI E-Firestorm | Losi Crawler | + many F1s, super crawlers, scalers, drifters in the works...
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 16-09-2011
Apricot Slice Apricot Slice is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Aberdeen
Posts: 177
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by colmo View Post
There's a few things about it (this is what I have read, not having had the car myself):

1) The chassis is very stiff indeed. That's not likely to be nice over bumps.

2) The motor is rather far back - in fact, the layout is the same as most modern touring cars. Most 4wd buggies have the motor much further forward - B44, FS2, DEX410, BMax4, TRF 502x, even the relatively similar TRF 511x all have the motor further forward.
A very rigid chassis was my first guess but other than that, no idea.
I wonder if slightly flexable shock towers would help calm it down.

I suppose its famed quickness is partly due the that weight distribution.
__________________
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 17-09-2011
wingnut wingnut is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 19
Default

i have one and for me the worst part was how low the car sits. because it uses such large pullys that if you keep the cvds level there isn't much ground clearance. if you downside everything really well it's a good car. if you overjump your landings the car get out of shape and bottoms out really easily.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 17-09-2011
markwilliamson2001's Avatar
markwilliamson2001 markwilliamson2001 is offline
Mad Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Ledbury, Herefordshire
Posts: 1,889
Send a message via MSN to markwilliamson2001
Default

The geometry and suspension arm angle because of the large pulleys ruined that car...
__________________
:: AE B5MCE - SP 7.5 v3.0 Brushless Motor - Reedy Shorty Lipo - Savox Servo - Spektrum Rx ::
:: Paint By Turnip Paint ::
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
oOple.com